Schonewille Lab

Department                            Neuroscience

Principal investigator          Martijn Schonewille

E-mail address                      m.schonewille@erasmusmc.nl

Website                                     www.neuro.nl/research/schonewille

 

When you lose all inhibition: interneuron dysfunction in brain development

Suitable as a BEP? No

Suitable as a MEP? Yes

Suitable as an Academic Research Project? No

Techniques:

  • Electrophysiology
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Confocal Microscopy
  • Image Analysis
  • Data Analysis

Supervisor: Catarina Osorio, c.osorio@erasmusmc.nl

Inhibitory interneurons are a large, diverse group of neurons important for fine-tuning neuronal circuits. Hence, errors in interneuron development lead to defects in circuit formation, resulting in several neurological disorders such as autism, schizophrenia, epilepsy, or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (Levitt et al., Trends Neurosci. 2004; Di Cristo, Clin Genet. 2007, Marin, Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012). A central question remains unanswered: how do different subtypes of interneurons contribute to circuitry formation and their specific role in brain function? While the interneuron role in circuit formation has been extensively explored in the neocortex, less attention has been given to the inhibitory GABAergic interneurons in the cerebellar cortex, particularly molecular layer interneurons (MLIs). Purkinje cells are the principal neurons in the cerebellar cortex, and they rely on the input of MLIs to regulate a variety of behaviors. Interestingly, cerebellar interneurons, like basket cells and stellate cells, migrate and differentiate at different time points. Both basket cells, and stellate cells are electrically active at early postnatal ages, but how loss of inhibitory activity influences the development of the cerebellum circuit.

Research Question: How does the electric activity of inhibitory interneurons influence the early formation of cerebellar circuitry? This question is at the heart of our research, as it holds the key to understanding the intricate process of brain development.

Further reading (click to link to article)

Purkinje cell intrinsic activity shapes cerebellar development and function

 

How neurons control movement: optogenetic stimulation during brace conditioning

Suitable as a BEP? Yes

Suitable as a MEP? Yes

Suitable as an Academic Research Project? No

Techniques:

  • Optogenetics
  • Coding for simulation
  • Coding for acquisition and analysis of data

This project aims to built and use the tools to combine a novel task, brace conditioning, with selective activation of specific neurons. For Brace conditioning a mouse is placed on a wheel, and presented with either only an LED light flash, or a light flash followed by a small movement of the wheel. Over time the mouse will learn to brace for the movement when the light is flashed. Optogenetic experiments will teach us which neurons are responsible for what part of the bracing movement. The goal in this project is to built the hardware and software controls to combine brace conditioning and optogenetic stimulation. A research technician or PhD student will perform the mouse handling parts.

Further reading (click to link to article)

Purkinje cell microzones mediate distinct kinematics of a single movement

 

(Example) projects submitted by lab in past years

(2024-2025) Cerebellar development and differentiation in sensorimotor control

Supervisor: Martijn Schonewille, m.schonewille@erasmusmc.nl

In our lab we study the development and contribution of different cell types to sensorimotor integration in the cerebellum, across a wide variety of technical approaches. Approaches range from in utero electroporation followed by morphological analysis, molecular biological techniques, electrophysiological recording in and ex vivo across life to various behavioral tasks. The goal is to 1) determine the key intrinsic processes, genetic and activity-dependent, that are require for proper cerebellar development and affected in neurodevelopmental disorders and 2) understand what features are contributed by different subpopulations of neurons to movement control and how these are affected in ataxia and other neurodegenerative disorders.

Techniques

  • molecular biological approaches (western blot, immunohistochemistry, RNAseq, qPCR)
  • ex vivo electrophysiology
  • home cage motion monitoring
  • in vivo electrophysiological recordings
  • various behavioral tasks.

Further reading

Purkinje cell microzones mediate distinct kinematics of a single movement

Pre-ataxic loss of intrinsic plasticity and motor learning in a mouse model of SCA1